I never understand how much amount of TNT did that spell cause? I know it was stromg enough to destroy his castle, but I want the exact equivalent of it.
I really need to jump back to the books before (or even if) Disney make their show.
Yeah. Ba Sing Se is the capital of the Earth Kingdom and came to be known as the impenetrable city. However, Azula manages to take over the city from the inside out. The city was rich and fill with the social class which leads to its downfall in the Legend of Korra.
But what I mean is that it has been a long while since I read the books, that I completely forgot many things like cities such as Arough. I planned to reread the books after I'm done with going over the Harry Potter books series again. But you have to help me with this one.
Okay, can somebody this explain for me?
I love Brisingr more for the story.
Isn't the Tsar bombs about fifty megaton of TNT?
Well it's not that bad.
Were the changes illogical or censorship?
What Robin Hood?
Jason... They are not gonna be movies of inheritance. It is just a high-budget show. They can not do The Inheritance Series as a movie. There is too much in the story that one of the reasons the movie failed (besides the acting, the terrible story, and the CGI Dragon) was because they couldn't fit in all the events from the book into an hour and thirty minutes. The first book would succeed as it could possibly fit in a two-hour and forty minutes timeframe, but not so much in the other.
I wished I can say the same for the Percy Jackson films. Except that movie was a complete failure because it didn't follow anything from the book. Like the only thing from the book it captures are "Perseus is the son of Poseidon", " Someone stole the Lightning Bolt", and "Perseus went to see his uncle in hell". Yeah, I know it is supposed to be the underworld, but the movie makes it look like Hell.
Movie... They are making a show out of both books.
That is different. Percy Jackson series can be read by young teens so it would make sense watching the series as a family. Eragon can be read by young adults and I don't mean fifteen to eighteen.
Also true. Let just hope it doesn't make it to child friendly. I mean, I get the idea of removing sacrifices slaves, corpses on a pike, and other unnecessary dark stuffs. But let hope they keep some adult content (not porno) on there.
I never understand how much amount of TNT did that spell cause? I know it was stromg enough to destroy his castle, but I want the exact equivalent of it.
Fear that Disney may ruin it like Fox perhaps?
Besides, I did point this one out not to long ago.
Of course, I do kinda hope to see the cult and sacrificing slaves are remove. Even while reading/listening to it gives me disturbing images.
I tried posting the post, but something is wrong with the link setting on the app. (Or it could be my phone eitherly.) So I copy the post.
According to The Streaming Buffer, Disney+ may be working on a reboot of the 20th Century Fox film Eragon.
Eragon, the first installment of Christopher Paolini’s Inheritance Cycle, was adapted for the screen in 2006. Upon its release, it was met with poor reviews and, ultimately, was a failure and the the rest of the planned franchise was cancelled.
The Streaming Buffer has been spending time looking at indexed webpages for Disney+ in the United Kingdom. One of these indexed pages shows a link to a property titled Eragon under the series banner, as shown below. (Sorry, can't copy the picture)
This seems to imply that Disney is working on a new adaptation of the story as a series, perhaps akin to what the company is doing with Percy Jackson.
It is also possible that this is simply an error and the 20th Century Fox film was mistaken placed under the series heading, rather than the film one. At this point, there is no way to know for sure.
Be sure to keep your eyes out for any future news regarding Eragon here at The DisInsider.
I'm not making this up. Just search Eragon Reboot Disney+. Now it could be good in that it would be more faithful to the books... or it could be bad as they might have to modify the movie to fit the more (weak) sensitivity of society as it stands. Opinions?
I'm sorry. But who dies again?